(c)1-2-14 by Donna Cunningham, MSW
Were you, like me, perturbed when Pluto was demoted from planet status several years back? I mean, what were we supposed to do about Scorpio, and what if Pluto was one of the strongest features in our charts? What about Pluto transits that kicked us in the keister on the way to transformation? And how were we going to explain it to our clients?
It just didn’t make sense somehow to dismiss Pluto’s role in astrology when its expressions were so hard to ignore. (Here’s the backstory: Planet or Not—Pluto IS Powerful! )
Well, there’s good news today. Astronomers have reconsidered. (Who made them God in the first place?) And now Pluto is back on the rolls. Here’s the story, found at: http://2paragraphs.com/2014/10/pluto-is-a-planet-again-according-to-harvard-astronomers/
“Planetologists (not sure if that’s a word, but it is now) can rejoice today because Pluto is once again a planet, eight years after being relegated to the status of dwarf planet by the International Astronomical Union (IAU).
“The debate was needed following the confusion that arose once Pluto was deemed too small to be a planet. The defining characteristics of a planet (a round thing which orbits the Sun and has ‘cleared the neighborhood’ around its orbit) “baffled the public and classrooms around the country,” according to the HSCFA.
“For one thing, it only applied to planets in our solar system. What about all those exoplanets orbiting other stars? Are they planets? And Pluto was booted from the planet club and called a dwarf planet. Is a dwarf planet a small planet?
Not according to the IAU. Even though a dwarf fruit tree is still a small fruit tree, and a dwarf hamster is still a small hamster.” “Astronomer Owen Gingerich pointed out that the word “planet” (derived from the Greek for ‘wanderer’) “is a culturally defined word that has changed its meaning over the ages,” and that Pluto definitely meets the criterion set out by fellow debater Dr. Dimitar Sasselov as ‘the smallest spherical lump of matter that formed around stars or stellar remnants.”
But Gareth Williams, associate director of the IAU’s Minor Planet Center (read: the baddies) argued that because there are many other solar bodies the same size as Pluto, they would have to also be considered planets, and that would be confusing for schoolchildren. “If Pluto is a planet, the number of planets in our solar system could rise to 25, “with the possibility of 50 or 100 within the next decade. Do we want schoolchildren to have to remember so many? No, we want to keep the numbers low.”
As an argument for keeping Pluto at the kiddies’ table, that seems pretty weak. The audience thought so too, and voted to restore Pluto to planet status. Good news for these Plutonians. And fans of Gustav Holst, who have probably been listening to an incomplete Planets Suite for several years.”
What about you, Reader? Are you glad Pluto is back? Let us hear from you in the comment section.